Vivien Hantusch

About

Pravduh –
news app concept

Overview
Pravduh — a news app that creates awareness for bias, subjectivity & other shortcomings in reporting, thus encouraging people to view multiple sources and do their due diligence when forming an opinion.


Roles
UI, UX Design
Prototyping


Timeline
November 2018

Why another news app?



When Elon Musk pitched his idea for a rating website for journalists & media outlets in May 2018, I discussed how the idea could reduce bias, falsehood and manipulation in journalism in one of my classes in university. Since fragmentation of news audiences is a growing problem that contributes to falsehoods being spread faster than ever before, I figured that making vast differences in the quality of different news websites / media outlets more visible might be a good start to address some of these problems.

What originally started as some raw sketches for a presentation quickly became an actual mockup I was working on to explore the idea further & come up with solutions for user identification, a rating system and the overall user experience and implementation.

Pravduh is based on the functionality and interface of the Apple News app, but includes the aforementioned rating system, so you can immediately see whether an article is biased or based on poor research. The Top Stories algorithm takes these ratings into account, pushing down articles that got worse ratings than others.

At the beginning of the project, I considered including a forum that would essentially be a Reddit & Twitter hybrid of sorts, where people would be able to discuss issues, either related to a specific article or a topic in general, and based on the principles of deliberation theory.

However, when taking the complexity of content moderation into account – an issue that even giant social media entities such as Facebook repeatedly struggle with –, I eventually made the decision not to include this feature. Even if there was an easily scalable solution to this issue, it's not clear whether another space/platform for discussion would be able to live up to the expectations.

Recent studies (Esau et al. 2017, Thimm et al. 2014) suggest that while asynchronous communication – such as in forums – and clearly defined topics will promote a rather deliberative discussion, but the overall participation is much lower than on major social media platforms like Twitter or Facebook.


Reducing the likelihood of trolls

By submitting their personal rating at the bottom of each article, users are helping to ensure neutral, fact-based and balanced articles are the ones getting the most attention, so people have a solid base of information to form their own opinion.

To reduce the likelihood of trolling and other low quality content, users have to submit their ID for verification when they're first signing up (similar to when you’re opening a bank account online). Ratings will still be anonymous.

This will probably not put an end to spam and users maintaining multiple accounts, but it’s keeping the barrier to entry reasonably high to discourage trolling & other harmful behavior, while also keeping it low enough to promote participation.


Visualizing individual ratings

By displaying each article’s individual rating on a scale from 1 (the worst) to 10 (the best), the user can quickly determine whether or not an article is worth reading while they’re scrolling through their news feed.

As a side effect, if less people click on articles that are poorly researched / biased etc, media outlets with low quality standards will, in the long run, need to deal with shrinking advertising revenue, eventually forcing them to improve or continue losing market share.

For additional details on how the article performed in different categories, and background knowledge on how those categories are defined, the user can simply tap on the rating to open the overlay shown in the mockup above. This seemed to be the best way to convey as much information as possible while not disrupting the user’s reading flow too much.

You can play around with the prototype here.

Sources

K. Esau, D. Frieß, C. Eilders (2017). Design Matters! An Empirical Analysis of Online Deliberation on Different News Platforms. Policy & Internet.

Thimm, C., Dang-Anh, M., & Einspänner, J. (2014). Mediatized politics—Structures and strategies of discursive participation and online deliberation on Twitter. Mediatized worlds.

McCarthy, K. J., & Dolfsma, W. (2014). Neutral media? Evidence of media bias and its economic impact. Review of Social Economy.

Got an idea we should work on together? Or just want to talk about spaceships?
Say hi! hi@vivien.space